Thread (21 messages) 21 messages, 3 authors, 2020-05-14

Re: [PATCH v17 05/10] fs,landlock: Support filesystem access-control

From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Date: 2020-05-14 17:32:18
Also in: linux-api, linux-arch, linux-doc, linux-fsdevel, linux-kselftest, lkml

On Thu, 14 May 2020, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
quoted
This needs to be converted to the LSM API via superblock blob stacking.

See Casey's old patch: 
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module/20190829232935.7099-2-casey@schaufler-ca.com/ (local)
s_landlock_inode_refs is quite similar to s_fsnotify_inode_refs, but I
can do it once the superblock security blob patch is upstream. Is it a
blocker for now? What is the current status of lbs_superblock?
Yes it is a blocker. Landlock should not be adding its own functions in 
core code, it should be using the LSM API (and extending that as needed).
Anyway, we also need to have a call to landlock_release_inodes() in
generic_shutdown_super(), which does not fit the LSM framework, and I
think it is not an issue. Landlock handling of inodes is quite similar
to fsnotify.
fsnotify is not an LSM.

-- 
James Morris
[off-list ref]
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help