RE: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] evm: Move hooks outside LSM infrastructure
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Date: 2020-05-07 07:53:41
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-integrity, lkml
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Date: 2020-05-07 07:53:41
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-integrity, lkml
-----Original Message----- From: Mimi Zohar [mailto:zohar@linux.ibm.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2020 11:10 PM To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>; david.safford@gmail.com; viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk; jmorris@namei.org; John Johansen [off-list ref] Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org; linux- security-module@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Silviu Vlasceanu [off-list ref] Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] evm: Move hooks outside LSM infrastructure On Wed, 2020-05-06 at 15:44 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:quoted
Since copying the EVM HMAC or original signature isn't applicable, I would prefer exploring an EVM portable and immutable signature only solution.To prevent copying the EVM xattr, we added "security.evm" to /etc/xattr.conf. To support copying just the EVM portable and immutable signatures will require a different solution.
This patch set removes the need for ignoring security.evm. It can be always copied, even if it is an HMAC. EVM will update it only when verification in the pre hook is successful. Combined with the ability of protecting a subset of files without introducing an EVM policy, these advantages seem to outweigh the effort necessary to make the switch. Roberto HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063 Managing Director: Li Peng, Li Jian, Shi Yanli