Re: [PATCH v10 8/9] proc: use human-readable values for hidehid
flat view
From: Alexey Gladkov <hidden>
Date: 2020-04-02 16:52:10
Also in:
linux-api, linux-fsdevel, lkml
On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 11:05:21AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Alexey Gladkov [off-list ref] writes:quoted
The hidepid parameter values are becoming more and more and it becomes difficult to remember what each new magic number means.In principle I like this change. In practice I think you have just broken ABI compatiblity with the new mount ABI. In particular the following line seems broken.quoted
diff --git a/fs/proc/root.c b/fs/proc/root.c index dbcd96f07c7a..ba782d6e6197 100644 --- a/fs/proc/root.c +++ b/fs/proc/root.c@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ enum proc_param { static const struct fs_parameter_spec proc_fs_parameters[] = { fsparam_u32("gid", Opt_gid), - fsparam_u32("hidepid", Opt_hidepid), + fsparam_string("hidepid", Opt_hidepid), fsparam_string("subset", Opt_subset), {} };As I read fs_parser.c fs_param_is_u32 handles string inputs and turns them into numbers, and it handles binary numbers. However fs_param_is_string appears to only handle strings. It appears to have not capacity to turn raw binary numbers into strings.
I use result only with hidepid_u32_spec and nobody modifies param->string. I do not use internal functions here. I don’t follow how a raw number can get here ?
So I think we probably need to fix fs_param_is_string to raw binary numbers before we can safely make this change to fs/proc/root.c David am I reading the fs_parser.c code correctly? If I am are you ok with a change like the above? Eric
-- Rgrds, legion