On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 09:40:15AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
Would it make sense to add reserved fields to the structs so that new
features can be added in a backwards compatible way? E.g. if we want to
allow userspace to control the backing store by passing in a file
descriptor ENCLAVE_CREATE.
It would not really be a huge win even if you did that since old
software would not be aware of the new fields. Sounds somewhat
messy to me.
Even a new ioctl later on is in my opinion always a better option
than reserved fields when you add ioctl's.
/Jarkko