Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/7] bpf: Refactor trampoline update code
From: KP Singh <hidden>
Date: 2020-03-04 18:44:46
Also in:
bpf, lkml
On 04-Mär 19:37, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 3/4/20 4:47 PM, KP Singh wrote:quoted
From: KP Singh <redacted> As we need to introduce a third type of attachment for trampolines, the flattened signature of arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline gets even more complicated. Refactor the prog and count argument to arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline to use bpf_tramp_progs to simplify the addition and accounting for new attachment types. Signed-off-by: KP Singh <redacted> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <redacted>[...]quoted
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c index c498f0fffb40..9f7e0328a644 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c@@ -320,6 +320,7 @@ static int bpf_struct_ops_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, struct bpf_struct_ops_value *uvalue, *kvalue; const struct btf_member *member; const struct btf_type *t = st_ops->type; + struct bpf_tramp_progs *tprogs = NULL; void *udata, *kdata; int prog_fd, err = 0; void *image;@@ -425,10 +426,18 @@ static int bpf_struct_ops_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, goto reset_unlock; } + tprogs = kcalloc(BPF_TRAMP_MAX, sizeof(*tprogs), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!tprogs) { + err = -ENOMEM; + goto reset_unlock; + } +Looking over the code again, I'm quite certain that here's a memleak since the kcalloc() is done in the for_each_member() loop in the ops update but then going out of scope and in the exit path we only kfree the last tprogs.
You're right, nice catch. Fixing it. - KP
quoted
+ tprogs[BPF_TRAMP_FENTRY].progs[0] = prog; + tprogs[BPF_TRAMP_FENTRY].nr_progs = 1; err = arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(image, st_map->image + PAGE_SIZE, &st_ops->func_models[i], 0, - &prog, 1, NULL, 0, NULL); + tprogs, NULL); if (err < 0) goto reset_unlock;@@ -469,6 +478,7 @@ static int bpf_struct_ops_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, memset(uvalue, 0, map->value_size); memset(kvalue, 0, map->value_size); unlock: + kfree(tprogs); mutex_unlock(&st_map->lock); return err; }