Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 5 authors, 2020-03-12

Re: [PATCH 01/14] VFS: Add additional RESOLVE_* flags [ver #18]

From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: 2020-03-12 16:56:56
Also in: linux-api, linux-fsdevel, lkml

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

Linus Torvalds [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
The whole discussion was triggered by the introduction of a completely
new fsinfo() call:

Would you propose to have 'at_flags' and 'resolve_flags' passed in here?
Yes, I think that would be the way to go.
Okay, I can do that.

Any thoughts on which set of flags should override the other?  If we're making
RESOLVE_* flags the new definitive interface, then I feel they should probably
override the AT_* flags where there's a conflict, ie. RESOLVE_NO_SYMLINKS
should override AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW for example.

David
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help