Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Make trampolines W^X
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Date: 2020-01-07 01:36:53
Also in:
bpf, lkml
On Jan 6, 2020, at 12:25 PM, Edgecombe, Rick P [off-list ref] wrote: On Sat, 2020-01-04 at 09:49 +0900, Andy Lutomirski wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
On Jan 4, 2020, at 8:47 AM, KP Singh [off-list ref] wrote:From: KP Singh [off-list ref] The image for the BPF trampolines is allocated with bpf_jit_alloc_exe_page which marks this allocated page executable. This means that the allocated memory is W and X at the same time making it susceptible to WX based attacks. Since the allocated memory is shared between two trampolines (the current and the next), 2 pages must be allocated to adhere to W^X and the following sequence is obeyed where trampolines are modified:Can we please do better rather than piling garbage on top of garbage?quoted
- Mark memory as non executable (set_memory_nx). While module_alloc for x86 allocates the memory as PAGE_KERNEL and not PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC, not all implementations of module_alloc do soHow about fixing this instead?quoted
- Mark the memory as read/write (set_memory_rw)Probably harmless, but see above about fixing it.quoted
- Modify the trampolineSeems reasonable. It’s worth noting that this whole approach is suboptimal: the “module” allocator should really be returning a list of pages to be written (not at the final address!) with the actual executable mapping to be materialized later, but that’s a bigger project that you’re welcome to ignore for now. (Concretely, it should produce a vmap address with backing pages but with the vmap alias either entirely unmapped or read-only. A subsequent healer would, all at once, make the direct map pages RO or not-present and make the vmap alias RX.)quoted
- Mark the memory as read-only (set_memory_ro) - Mark the memory as executable (set_memory_x)No, thanks. There’s very little excuse for doing two IPI flushes when one would suffice. As far as I know, all architectures can do this with a single flush without races x86 certainly can. The module freeing code gets this sequence right. Please reuse its mechanism or, if needed, export the relevant interfaces.So if I understand this right, some trampolines have been added that are currently set as RWX at modification time AND left that way during runtime? The discussion on the order of set_memory_() calls in the commit message made me think that this was just a modification time thing at first.
I’m not sure what the status quo is. We really ought to have a genuinely good API for allocation and initialization of text. We can do so much better than set_memory_blahblah. FWIW, I have some ideas about making kernel flushes cheaper. It’s currently blocked on finding some time and on tglx’s irqtrace work.
Also, is there a reason you couldn't use text_poke() to modify the trampoline with a single flush?
Does text_poke to an IPI these days?