On Sat, 2 Nov 2019 at 01:50, Jarkko Sakkinen
[off-list ref] wrote:

On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 03:04:18PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:

quoted

Isn't this statement contradicting with your earlier statement
regarding the right order would be to complete TEE patches review
first and then come up with documentation here [2]?

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/1568025601.4614.253.camel@linux.ibm.com/ (local)
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20190909163643.qxmzpcggi567hmhv@linux.intel.com/ (local)

With the intersecting issues, namely key generation and conflicting
keyctl parameters, that was not a well considered statement.

Okay, let me work on documentation first, but I think resending whole
patch-set just for documentation review and rework would be an
overkill. Would minor revisions of this patch only like v3.1, v3.2
etc. work for you? And later I could send next version of this
patch-set once we agree on documentation.

-Sumit

/Jarkko