Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 3 authors, 2019-11-06

Re: [PATCH] security/keyring: avoid pagefaults in keyring_read_iterator

From: Chris von Recklinghausen <hidden>
Date: 2019-10-21 15:46:29
Also in: keyrings, lkml

On 10/21/2019 10:21 AM, David Howells wrote:
Chris von Recklinghausen [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
The put_user call from keyring_read_iterator caused a page fault which
attempts to lock mm->mmap_sem and type->lock_class (key->sem) in the reverse
order that keyring_read_iterator did, thus causing the circular locking
dependency.

Remedy this by using access_ok and __put_user instead of put_user so we'll
return an error instead of faulting in the page.
I wonder if it's better to create a kernel buffer outside of the lock in
keyctl_read_key().  Hmmm...  The reason I didn't want to do that is that
keyrings have don't have limits on the size.  Maybe that's not actually a
problem, since 1MiB would be able to hold a list of a quarter of a million
keys.

David
Hi David,

Thanks for the feedback.

I can try to prototype that, but regardless of where the kernel buffer
is allocated, the important part is causing the initial pagefault in the
read path outside the lock so __put_user won't fail due to a valid user
address but page backing the user address isn't in-core.

I'll start work on v2.

Thanks,

Chris
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help