Re: [PATCH RFC] perf_event: Add support for LSM and SELinux checks
From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Date: 2019-10-10 02:45:08
Also in:
bpf, lkml, selinux
From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Date: 2019-10-10 02:45:08
Also in:
bpf, lkml, selinux
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019, Casey Schaufler wrote:
On 10/9/2019 3:14 PM, James Morris wrote:quoted
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019, Casey Schaufler wrote:quoted
Please consider making the perf_alloc security blob maintained by the infrastructure rather than the individual modules. This will save it having to be changed later.Is anyone planning on using this with full stacking? If not, we don't need the extra code & complexity. Stacking should only cover what's concretely required by in-tree users.I don't believe it's any simpler for SELinux to do the allocation than for the infrastructure to do it. I don't see anyone's head exploding over the existing infrastructure allocation of blobs. We're likely to want it at some point, so why not avoid the hassle and delay by doing it the "new" way up front?
Because it is not necessary. -- James Morris [off-list ref]