Thread (52 messages) flat view 52 messages, 11 authors, 2022-01-05

Re: [PATCH V40 03/29] security: Add a static lockdown policy LSM

From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: 2019-08-30 16:28:29
Also in: linux-api, lkml

Matthew Garrett [off-list ref] wrote:
+static char *lockdown_reasons[LOCKDOWN_CONFIDENTIALITY_MAX+1] = {
const char *const maybe?
+static enum lockdown_reason lockdown_levels[] = {LOCKDOWN_NONE,
+						 LOCKDOWN_INTEGRITY_MAX,
+						 LOCKDOWN_CONFIDENTIALITY_MAX};
+
const?

Isn't this also a 1:1 mapping?
+static int lock_kernel_down(const char *where, enum lockdown_reason level)
Is the last parameter the reason or the level?  You're mixing the terms.

David
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help