Hi Prakhar,

quoted

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c
index ea7d8cbf712f..83ca99d65e4b 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c

@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ void ima_add_violation(struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename,
 	struct ima_template_entry *entry;
 	struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
 	struct ima_event_data event_data = {iint, file, filename, NULL, 0,
-					    cause};
+					    cause, NULL, 0};

This change here and

quoted

 	int violation = 1;
 	int result;
 

@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ void ima_store_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
 	struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
 	struct ima_template_entry *entry;
 	struct ima_event_data event_data = {iint, file, filename, xattr_value,
-					    xattr_len, NULL};
+					    xattr_len, NULL, NULL, 0};

here and 

quoted

 	int violation = 0;
 
 	if (iint->measured_pcrs & (0x1 << pcr))

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c
index 993d0f1915ff..c8591406c0e2 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c

@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static int __init ima_add_boot_aggregate(void)
 	struct ima_template_entry *entry;
 	struct integrity_iint_cache tmp_iint, *iint = &tmp_iint;
 	struct ima_event_data event_data = {iint, NULL, boot_aggregate_name,
-					    NULL, 0, NULL};
+					    NULL, 0, NULL, NULL, 0};

here, don't belong in this patch.  It belongs in "IMA: support for per
policy rule template formats", in case it should ever be backported.
 Please post this as a separate patch, that will be squashed with
"IMA: support for per policy rule template formats".

Might mistake.  I should have picked up Thaigo's "ima: Use designated
initializers for struct ima_event_data".  Please drop these changes
instead.

thanks,

Mimi

quoted

 	int result = -ENOMEM;
 	int violation = 0;
 	struct {