On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 03:23:07PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:

Maybe lsm_export_is_interesting()?
I'd love to discover there's a convention I could adhere to.

I'd agree "lsm_data" seems meaningless. lsm_export does seem a better
name, though it has the "export is also a verb" issue. Would "lsm_context"
or "lsm_ctx"?
be better?

then we get lsm_ctx_is_interesting() and lsm_ctx_to_secid() ?

-- 
Kees Cook