Re: [PATCH 3/4] ima: don't ignore INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN EVM status
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2019-05-20 21:20:34
Also in:
linux-doc, linux-integrity, lkml, stable
On Thu, 2019-05-16 at 18:12 +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt index 52e6fbb042cc..80e1c233656b 100644 --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt@@ -1588,6 +1588,9 @@ Format: { "off" | "enforce" | "fix" | "log" } default: "enforce" + ima_appraise_req_evm + [IMA] require EVM for appraisal with file digests.
As much as possible we want to limit the number of new boot command line options as possible. Is there a reason for not extending "ima_appraise=" with "require-evm" or "enforce-evm"? Mimi
+ ima_appraise_tcb [IMA] Deprecated. Use ima_policy= instead. The builtin appraise policy appraises all files owned by uid=0.