Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 6 authors, 2019-02-25

Re: [PATCH v2] LSM: Ignore "security=" when "lsm=" is specified

From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Date: 2019-02-18 02:46:12
Also in: lkml, selinux

On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 12:17 AM Tetsuo Handa
[off-list ref] wrote:
On 2019/02/14 1:05, Casey Schaufler wrote:
quoted
On 2/12/2019 10:23 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
quoted
To avoid potential confusion, explicitly ignore "security=" when "lsm=" is
used on the command line, and report that it is happening.

Suggested-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <redacted>
Acked-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
The manual for TOMOYO was updated to follow this change.
SELinux folks and AppArmor folks, can we apply this change?
My main concern is that "selinux={0|1}" continues to work as it has
for years.  It doesn't look like this affects that, but I can't say
I've dug into these changes very far.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help