Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 5 authors, 2019-02-01

Re: [PATCH] security: mark expected switch fall-throughs

From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2019-01-31 20:21:06
Also in: linux-integrity, lkml

On Thu, 2019-01-31 at 14:12 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Mimi,

On 1/31/19 1:58 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
quoted
[Cc'ing James Morris]

On Thu, 2019-01-24 at 21:47 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <redacted>
Acked-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
BTW, thanks, Casey.  I'll take this in my tree.
This patch touches multiple LSMs and IMA.  As James has already picked
up similar patches, which are in his next-general branch, perhaps he
could also pick up an updated version of this one.
Yeah.  I can either integrate your recent fix and respin if you don't mind,
or remove the fall-through comment and wait for James to take both patches,
yours and mine.

What do you prefer?
Either way is fine.

Mimi
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help