Re: [PATCH security-next v3 01/29] LSM: Correctly announce start of LSM... | linux-security-module

[PATCH security-next v3 00/29] LSM: Explict LSM ordering · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
[PATCH security-next v3 01/29] LSM: Correctly announce start of LSM initialization · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 01/29] LSM: Correctly announce start of LSM initialization · James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> · 2018-10-01
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 01/29] LSM: Correctly announce start of LSM initialization · John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> · 2018-10-01
[PATCH security-next v3 02/29] vmlinux.lds.h: Avoid copy/paste of security_init section · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 02/29] vmlinux.lds.h: Avoid copy/paste of security_init section · James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> · 2018-10-01
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 02/29] vmlinux.lds.h: Avoid copy/paste of security_init section · John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> · 2018-10-01
[PATCH security-next v3 06/29] vmlinux.lds.h: Move LSM_TABLE into INIT_DATA · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 06/29] vmlinux.lds.h: Move LSM_TABLE into INIT_DATA · John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> · 2018-10-01
[PATCH security-next v3 05/29] LSM: Convert from initcall to struct lsm_info · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 05/29] LSM: Convert from initcall to struct lsm_info · James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> · 2018-10-01
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 05/29] LSM: Convert from initcall to struct lsm_info · John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> · 2018-10-01
[PATCH security-next v3 08/29] LSM: Record LSM name in struct lsm_info · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 08/29] LSM: Record LSM name in struct lsm_info · John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> · 2018-10-01
[PATCH security-next v3 09/29] LSM: Provide init debugging infrastructure · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 09/29] LSM: Provide init debugging infrastructure · John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> · 2018-10-01
[PATCH security-next v3 13/29] LoadPin: Rename "enable" to "enforce" · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 13/29] LoadPin: Rename "enable" to "enforce" · John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> · 2018-10-01
[PATCH security-next v3 15/29] LSM: Lift LSM selection out of individual LSMs · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 15/29] LSM: Lift LSM selection out of individual LSMs · John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> · 2018-10-01
[PATCH security-next v3 16/29] LSM: Prepare for arbitrary LSM enabling · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 16/29] LSM: Prepare for arbitrary LSM enabling · John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> · 2018-10-01
[PATCH security-next v3 28/29] LSM: Separate idea of "major" LSM from "exclusive" LSM · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
[PATCH security-next v3 21/29] LSM: Build ordered list of ordered LSMs for init · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
[PATCH security-next v3 23/29] LSM: Introduce "lsm.order=" for boottime ordering · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
[PATCH security-next v3 27/29] capability: Initialize as LSM_ORDER_FIRST · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
[PATCH security-next v3 29/29] LSM: Add all exclusive LSMs to ordered initialization · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
[PATCH security-next v3 14/29] LSM: Plumb visibility into optional "enabled" state · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 14/29] LSM: Plumb visibility into optional "enabled" state · John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> · 2018-10-01
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 14/29] LSM: Plumb visibility into optional "enabled" state · James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> · 2018-10-01
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 14/29] LSM: Plumb visibility into optional "enabled" state · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-10-01
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 14/29] LSM: Plumb visibility into optional "enabled" state · John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> · 2018-10-01
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 14/29] LSM: Plumb visibility into optional "enabled" state · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-10-01
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 14/29] LSM: Plumb visibility into optional "enabled" state · John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> · 2018-10-01
[PATCH security-next v3 10/29] LSM: Don't ignore initialization failures · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 10/29] LSM: Don't ignore initialization failures · John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> · 2018-10-01
[PATCH security-next v3 11/29] LSM: Introduce LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 11/29] LSM: Introduce LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR · John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> · 2018-10-01
[PATCH security-next v3 12/29] LSM: Provide separate ordered initialization · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 12/29] LSM: Provide separate ordered initialization · John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> · 2018-10-01
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 12/29] LSM: Provide separate ordered initialization · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-10-01
[PATCH security-next v3 07/29] LSM: Convert security_initcall() into DEFINE_LSM() · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 07/29] LSM: Convert security_initcall() into DEFINE_LSM() · John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> · 2018-10-01
[PATCH security-next v3 03/29] LSM: Rename .security_initcall section to .lsm_info · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 03/29] LSM: Rename .security_initcall section to .lsm_info · James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> · 2018-10-01
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 03/29] LSM: Rename .security_initcall section to .lsm_info · John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> · 2018-10-01
[PATCH security-next v3 04/29] LSM: Remove initcall tracing · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 04/29] LSM: Remove initcall tracing · Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> · 2018-09-26
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 04/29] LSM: Remove initcall tracing · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-26
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 04/29] LSM: Remove initcall tracing · Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> · 2018-09-30
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 04/29] LSM: Remove initcall tracing · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-10-01
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 04/29] LSM: Remove initcall tracing · John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> · 2018-10-01
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 04/29] LSM: Remove initcall tracing · Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> · 2018-10-01
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 04/29] LSM: Remove initcall tracing · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-10-01
[PATCH security-next v3 25/29] Yama: Initialize as ordered LSM · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
[PATCH security-next v3 17/29] LSM: Introduce CONFIG_LSM_ENABLE · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 17/29] LSM: Introduce CONFIG_LSM_ENABLE · John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> · 2018-10-01
[PATCH security-next v3 24/29] LoadPin: Initialize as ordered LSM · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
[PATCH security-next v3 20/29] LSM: Refactor "security=" in terms of enable/disable · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
[PATCH security-next v3 22/29] LSM: Introduce CONFIG_LSM_ORDER · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
[PATCH security-next v3 26/29] LSM: Introduce enum lsm_order · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
[PATCH security-next v3 18/29] LSM: Introduce lsm.enable= and lsm.disable= · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 18/29] LSM: Introduce lsm.enable= and lsm.disable= · John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> · 2018-10-01
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 18/29] LSM: Introduce lsm.enable= and lsm.disable= · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-10-01
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 18/29] LSM: Introduce lsm.enable= and lsm.disable= · John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> · 2018-10-01
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 18/29] LSM: Introduce lsm.enable= and lsm.disable= · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-10-01
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 18/29] LSM: Introduce lsm.enable= and lsm.disable= · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-10-01
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 18/29] LSM: Introduce lsm.enable= and lsm.disable= · John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> · 2018-10-01
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 18/29] LSM: Introduce lsm.enable= and lsm.disable= · John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> · 2018-10-01
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 18/29] LSM: Introduce lsm.enable= and lsm.disable= · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-10-01
[PATCH security-next v3 19/29] LSM: Prepare for reorganizing "security=" logic · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-25
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 19/29] LSM: Prepare for reorganizing "security=" logic · John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> · 2018-10-01
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 00/29] LSM: Explict LSM ordering · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2018-09-28
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 00/29] LSM: Explict LSM ordering · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-28
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 00/29] LSM: Explict LSM ordering · Stephen Smalley <hidden> · 2018-09-28
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 00/29] LSM: Explict LSM ordering · Stephen Smalley <hidden> · 2018-09-28
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 00/29] LSM: Explict LSM ordering · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-28
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 00/29] LSM: Explict LSM ordering · Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> · 2018-09-29
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 00/29] LSM: Explict LSM ordering · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-29
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 00/29] LSM: Explict LSM ordering · Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> · 2018-09-30
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 00/29] LSM: Explict LSM ordering · Kees Cook <hidden> · 2018-09-30
Re: [PATCH security-next v3 00/29] LSM: Explict LSM ordering · John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> · 2018-09-29

Re: [PATCH security-next v3 01/29] LSM: Correctly announce start of LSM initialization

From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Date: 2018-10-01 19:53:58
Also in: linux-arch, linux-doc, lkml

On Mon, 24 Sep 2018, Kees Cook wrote:

For a while now, the LSM core has said it was "initializED", rather than
"initializING". This adjust the report to be more accurate (i.e. before
this was reported before any LSMs had been initialized.)

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>


Reviewed-by: James Morris <redacted>


-- 
James Morris
[off-list ref]

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help