[PATCH 1/6] firmware: permit LSMs and IMA to fail firmware sysfs fallback loading
From: Mimi Zohar <hidden>
Date: 2018-05-04 00:36:38
Also in:
linux-integrity, lkml
On Fri, 2018-05-04 at 00:02 +0000, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
If you can add Andres Rodriguez [off-list ref], and Greg to your Cc list in the future patches that'd be appreciated. On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 09:48:18AM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:quoted
Add an LSM hook prior to allowing firmware sysfs fallback loading. Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <redacted> Cc: Luis R. Rodriguez <redacted> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Kees Cook <redacted> Cc: Matthew Garrett <redacted> --- drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback.c | 7 +++++++ include/linux/fs.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback.c b/drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback.c index 31b5015b59fe..23d2af30474e 100644 --- a/drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback.c +++ b/drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback.c@@ -651,6 +651,8 @@ static bool fw_force_sysfs_fallback(unsigned int opt_flags) static bool fw_run_sysfs_fallback(unsigned int opt_flags) { + int ret; + if (fw_fallback_config.ignore_sysfs_fallback) { pr_info_once("Ignoring firmware sysfs fallback due to sysctl knob\n"); return false;@@ -659,6 +661,11 @@ static bool fw_run_sysfs_fallback(unsigned int opt_flags) if ((opt_flags & FW_OPT_NOFALLBACK)) return false; + /* Also permit LSMs and IMA to fail firmware sysfs fallback */ + ret = security_kernel_read_file(NULL, READING_FIRMWARE_FALLBACK); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + return fw_force_sysfs_fallback(opt_flags); }diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h index 760d8da1b6c7..dc16a73c3d38 100644 --- a/include/linux/fs.h +++ b/include/linux/fs.h@@ -2810,6 +2810,7 @@ extern int do_pipe_flags(int *, int); id(UNKNOWN, unknown) \ id(FIRMWARE, firmware) \ id(FIRMWARE_PREALLOC_BUFFER, firmware) \ + id(FIRMWARE_FALLBACK, firmware) \If you're going to add this perhaps FIRMWARE_FALLBACK_SYSFS as we may later get FIRMWARE_FALLBACK_EFI.
From an IMA signature verification perspective, both are buffer based.
?The file signature is stored as a security xattr. ?Without a file descriptor, the kernel cannot verify the firmware signature. I don't have a problem with defining another enumeration. ?Perhaps other LSMs will want to be able to differentiate between sysfs and EFI fallback methods. Mimi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html