On Fri, 2018-03-16 at 14:21 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 05:52:24PM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
quoted
Hi Jarrko,
On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 18:56 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
quoted
In order to make struct tpm_buf the first class object for constructing TPM
commands, migrate tpm2_probe() to use it.
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <redacted>
With this patch, the Pi doesn't find the TPM. ?I'm seeing the
following line in dmesg.
[????1.087414] tpm_tis_spi: probe of spi0.0 failed with error 256
Thank you for reporting this Mimi. Does it have TPM1/TPM2?
The pi has a TPM 2.0 attached to the GPIO. ?James pointed out the
change in return codes.
+ if (be16_to_cpu(out->tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)
chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2;
-
- return 0;
+out:
+ tpm_buf_destroy(&buf);
+ return rc;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm2_probe);
Mimi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html