Thread (11 messages) flat view 11 messages, 4 authors, 2018-02-07

[RFC PATCH v4 1/2] fuse: introduce new fs_type flag FS_IMA_NO_CACHE

From: Alban Crequy <hidden>
Date: 2018-02-05 14:16:04
Also in: linux-fsdevel, linux-integrity, lkml

On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 5:10 PM, Miklos Szeredi [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 4:33 PM, Mimi Zohar [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Fri, 2018-02-02 at 10:20 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
quoted
Hi Miklos,

On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 19:06 +0100, Dongsu Park wrote:
quoted
From: Alban Crequy <redacted>

This new fs_type flag FS_IMA_NO_CACHE means files should be re-measured,
re-appraised and re-audited each time. Cached integrity results should
not be used.

It is useful in FUSE because the userspace FUSE process can change the
underlying files at any time without notifying the kernel.
I don't really have an understanding what IMA is doing, I think the
same thing applies to any network filesystem (i.e. ones with
d_revalidate).

Isn't that the case?
Hi Miklos,
From my limited understanding, network filesystems might need that
too, yes. I don't know if there are people interested in using both
IMA and network filesystems. If so, they would have to write that
patch and test it.

It is not a new issue, for neither network filesystems or FUSE. But I
am more interested in the FUSE use case because FUSE can be mounted by
unprivileged users either today with fusermount installed with setuid,
or soon with the coming patches to allow FUSE mounts in a non-init
user namespace. That makes the issue more visible than for network
filesystems where unprivileged users cannot mount.

Cheers,
Alban
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help