Hi,
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 6:40 PM, Dongsu Park [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 5:33 PM, Mimi Zohar [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 06:56 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
...
quoted
Did you get a chance to make the change and test it?
Alban has been on holidays, so he will be back on Wednesday or so.
So I'll try to understand what you meant in the last email.
As IMA_DONE_MASK contains all other bitmasks, it's possible to
optimize the code like this:
if (test_and_clear_bit(IMA_CHANGE_XATTR, &iint->atomic_flags)) {
iint->flags &= ~IMA_DONE_MASK;
} else if (inode->i_sb->s_type->fs_flags & FS_IMA_NO_CACHE) {
iint->flags &= ~IMA_DONE_MASK;
if (action & IMA_MEASURE)
iint->measured_pcrs = 0;
}
Is that what you want to see? Please let me know if it's not.
Tomorrow I will try to test with a new patch.
Today I created a new patch, and tested it. It worked fine.
So I've just sent a new patchset v4. Please see:
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org/msg1598387.html
Thanks,
Dongsu
Thanks,
Dongsu
quoted
Mimi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html