On Wed, 6 Dec 2017, Sargun Dhillon wrote:

Should I respin this patch sans module unloading? Still a set of dynamic 
hooks that are independent to allow for sealable memory support.

Yes, please.

I'm also wondering what people think of the fs change? I don't think 
that it makes a lot of sense just having one giant list. I was thinking 
it might make more sense using the module_name instead.

I don't know how useful this will be in practice.  Who/what will be 
looking at these entries and why?


-- 
James Morris
[off-list ref]

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html