[PATCH V3 2/2] IMA: Support using new creds in appraisal policy
From: Matthew Garrett <hidden>
Date: 2017-12-15 22:35:57
Also in:
linux-integrity, selinux
From: Matthew Garrett <hidden>
Date: 2017-12-15 22:35:57
Also in:
linux-integrity, selinux
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Matthew Garrett [off-list ref] wrote:
Hm, sorry, missed this mail. On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Mimi Zohar [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 13:37 -0800, Matthew Garrett wrote:quoted
security_task_getsecid(current) will give the same results as security_cred_getsecid(current_creds())Unwinding security_task_getsecid(current) looks like it is using real_cred, while current_cred() is using cred.Good question, and there's a current_real_cred() macro, so I should just use that instead.
Hm. Actually, I'm not sure. For most checks we were using cred, and only using real_cred for the secid lookup. This feels somewhat inconsistent. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html