On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 04:34:21PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:

On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 09:04:04AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 08:50:44AM +0530, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote:

quoted

I am assuming you are talking about the following patches - using
struct tpm_chip instead of chip number and this patch.

yes

quoted

I won't be able to test if struct tpm_chip usage as I don't have
multiple tpm hw in one machine. In case of tpm rng changes I can test
only the lifecycle of tpm rng device. Is that enough? I feel my test
will be limited. Please provide your thoughts on this.

That is certainly better than no testing.

Jason

WFM too.

Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <redacted>

/Jarkko

I applied these commits. Please check that everything is correct as
I had to do manual work with the 2nd commit.

/Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html