Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 6 authors, 2017-10-26

Fixing CVE-2017-15361

From: Jarkko Sakkinen <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-26 14:06:10
Also in: linux-integrity, lkml

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 02:59:02PM +0200, Michal Such?nek wrote:
It does not really matter. People ignore the messages unless looking
for something specific as you already noticed. Warn seems adequate
because the cipher is weaker than expected but not known to
be compromised. People who care can look up the message. People who
don't care will ignore it even if it's crit.
Is it worth of trouble to do any driver changes then (open question to
everyone)? I'm not sure it is worth of trouble to add cruft to the
driver code for a warning that will likely be ignored anyway.
quoted
you can have special commands and talk to the TPM to do the upgrade
even if it is part of the platform and not connected to a standard
bus.
Unless the upgrade command is disabled to not disrupt the platform, of
course.
Sure. This misconception partly came from live discussions at Prague. Of
course it you can have vendor specific commands to achieve this.

Maybe the original statement came from the fact that on most consumer
devices this is disabled?
Thanks

Michal
/Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help