about context gap
From: Ken Goldman <hidden>
Date: 2017-09-26 19:10:36
Also in:
linux-integrity
On 9/16/2017 11:36 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
Hi
While sitting at the airport I started to think a bit about the context
gap issue.
I think first thing that would make sense would be to have a 64-bit
shadow count for every TPM space i.e.
atomic_long_t tpm2_ctx_cnt;
struct tpm2_space {
/* ... */
u64 ctx_cnt;
};
For every create and load of a session you will read the global count
and increase it. This way we have get a well defined order.
With this organization we could for example put tpm spaces to a
red-black tree and refresh the oldest tpm space (just first thought
that came to mind).I think the algorithm is as follows: 1 - Each saved context has a sequence number. It can either be extracted once and saved in a table or extracted from the context blob when needed. 2 - When a startauthsession or contextload returns the TPM_RC_CONTEXT_GAP error 2A - find the lowest context blob sequence number 2B - contextload it 2C - contextsave it This is just for sessions, not objects. ~~ A fundamental design question is whether the application can call contextsave for sessions, or whether the command is reserved for the resource manager. I personally think it adds a lot of complication - the session blob has to be sort of virtualized. The use case - one application saving a session, then handing it over to another application that loads it - doesn't seem worth the complexity. It should be discussed up front, because it affects the code. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html