[tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] tpm: improve tpm_tis send() performance by ignoring burstcount
From: Michal Suchánek <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-16 10:24:27
Also in:
lkml
From: Michal Suchánek <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-16 10:24:27
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 18:02:57 -0400 Ken Goldman [off-list ref] wrote:
On 8/13/2017 7:53 PM, msuchanek wrote:quoted
About 500 out of 700 mainboards sold today has a PS/2 port which is probably due to prevalence of legacy devices and usbhid limitations. Similarily many boards have serial and parallel hardware ports. In all diagrams detailed enough to show these ports I have seen them attached to the LPC bus.Do these boards have a TPM? Remember that the TPM requires special LPC bus cycles.
Out of nearly 700 boards over 500 have PS/2 connector and over 400 have TPM slot (which is subset of the PS/2 enabled boards). Some more possibly have on-board TPM chip.
Even if so, the TPM LPC bus wait states are less than a usec. My thought is that it's unlikely that any device (serial port, mouse, keyboard, printer) will be adversely affected.
Yes, in theory this is negligible. So unless there is a possibility these wait states chain or the device otherwise takes over the bus for extended period of time this should be fine. Thanks Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html