Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 6 authors, 2017-07-14

[PATCH v2] xattr: Enable security.capability in user namespaces

flat view

From: Stefan Berger <hidden>
Date: 2017-07-14 11:32:53
Also in: lkml, oe-lkp

On 07/13/2017 08:38 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Stefan Berger [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On 07/13/2017 01:49 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
quoted
My big question right now is can you implement Ted's suggested
restriction.  Only one security.foo or secuirty.foo at ... attribute ?
We need to raw-list the xattrs and do the check before writing them. I am fairly sure this can be done.

So now you want to allow security.foo and one security.foo at uid=<> or just a single one security.foo(@[[:print:]]*)?
The latter.
That case would prevent a container user from overriding the xattr on 
the host. Is that what we want? For limiting the number of xattrs and 
getting that functionality (override IMA signature for example) the 
former seems better...

For the former I now have the topmost patch here: 
https://github.com/stefanberger/linux/commits/xattr_for_userns.v3

    Stefan

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help