[PATCH 1/3] Protectable memory support
From: Jerome Glisse <hidden>
Date: 2017-07-07 18:48:51
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 11:42:09AM +0300, Igor Stoppa wrote:
On 06/07/17 19:27, Jerome Glisse wrote:quoted
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 04:46:26PM +0300, Igor Stoppa wrote:
[...]
quoted
Yet another way is to use some of the free struct page fields ie when a page is allocated for vmalloc i think most of struct page fields are unuse (mapping, index, lru, ...). It would be better to use those rather than adding a page flag.Like introducing an unnamed union? Some sort of vmalloc_page_subtype? If that is what you are proposing, I agree that it would work in a similar fashion as what I have now, but without introducing the overhead of the extra page flag.
No need to introduce unamed union or anything. Just use one of the existing field for install you can make page->mapping point to the pmalloc pool structure. Or you can store a unique key value. I believe there is enough unuse field that for vmalloc pages that you should find one you can use. Just add some documentation in mm_types.h so people are aware of alternate use for the field you are using. J?r?me -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html