On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 09:36 +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:

On 5/30/2017 5:35 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote:

quoted

On Fri, 2017-05-05 at 16:21 +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:

quoted

pcrlock() has been modified to pass the correct arguments
to tpm_pcr_extend(): the pointer of a tpm2_digest structure containing
a random value generated by tpm_get_random() and the size of the array (1).

If the number of arguments is wrong, that means the patch that
introduced the change is not bi-sect safe.  (This comment is
applicable to patch 5/5 too.)

Jarkko (the TPM driver maintainer) asked me to not introduce
a new function to pass multiple digests, but to modify
the parameters of tpm_pcr_extend().

Since struct tpm2_digest is a static size, shouldn't we be able to
compute the number of digests?

Mimi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html