Thread (105 messages) 105 messages, 10 authors, 2021-10-06

Re: [PATCH v2 00/84] Call scsi_done() directly

From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Date: 2021-09-30 16:08:06

On 9/30/21 12:25 AM, Bean Huo wrote:
On Wed, 2021-09-29 at 15:04 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
quoted
This patch series increases IOPS by 5% on my test setup in a single-
threaded
test with queue depth 1 on top of the scsi_debug driver.
Here you mentioned queue depth 1. Does this mean SW queue depth?
Hi Bean,

Yes, what I wrote refers to the queue depth of the submitter. The script that I used
to measure performance with and without this patch series is as follows:

#!/bin/bash

iodepth=${1:-1}
runtime=30
blocksize=512
numcpus=$(nproc)

modprobe -r scsi_debug
modprobe scsi_debug max_queue=128 submit_queues="$numcpus" delay=0 &&
     udevadm settle

DEVICE=$(find /sys/bus/pseudo/drivers/scsi_debug/adapter*/host*/target*/*/block/ -maxdepth 1 -type d | grep -v 'block/$' | head -1 | xargs basename) || exit $?
[ -n "$DEVICE" ] || exit $?

args=()
if [ "$iodepth" = 1 ]; then
	args+=(--ioengine=psync)
else
	args+=(--ioengine=io_uring --iodepth_batch=$((iodepth/2)))
fi
args+=(
     --bs="${blocksize}"
     --direct=1
     --filename=/dev/"$DEVICE"
     --group_reporting=1
     --gtod_reduce=1
     --invalidate=1
     --iodepth="$iodepth"
     --ioscheduler=none
     --loops=$((1<<20))
     --name=scsi_debug
     --numjobs=1
     --runtime="$runtime"
     --rw=read
     --thread
       )
set -x
if numactl -m 0 -N 0 echo >&/dev/null; then
	numactl -m 0 -N 0 -- fio "${args[@]}"
else
	fio "${args[@]}"
fi
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help