Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] scsi: ufs: Fix error handler clear ua deadlock

[PATCH V5 0/3] scsi: ufs: Let devices remain runtime suspended during system suspend · Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> · 2021-09-22
[PATCH V5 1/3] scsi: ufs: Fix error handler clear ua deadlock · Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> · 2021-09-22
Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] scsi: ufs: Fix error handler clear ua deadlock · Kiwoong Kim <hidden> · 2021-09-28
Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] scsi: ufs: Fix error handler clear ua deadlock · Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> · 2021-09-30
Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] scsi: ufs: Fix error handler clear ua deadlock · Kiwoong Kim <hidden> · 2021-09-29
Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] scsi: ufs: Fix error handler clear ua deadlock · Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> · 2021-09-30
[PATCH V5 2/3] scsi: ufs: Fix runtime PM dependencies getting broken · Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> · 2021-09-22
[PATCH V5 3/3] scsi: ufs: Let devices remain runtime suspended during system suspend · Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> · 2021-09-22
Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] scsi: ufs: Let devices remain runtime suspended during system suspend · Asutosh Das (asd) <hidden> · 2021-09-22

From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Date: 2021-09-30 12:45:18

On 28/09/2021 09:55, Kiwoong Kim wrote:

quoted

+static int ufshcd_request_sense_direct(struct ufs_hba *hba, u8 wlun)

..

How about using ufshcd_compose_dev_cmd w/ modifying the function,
ufshcd_prepare_utp_scsi_cmd_upiu and something ? I think it can be made
w/ small changes. And for prdt, it seems to be good because it's tiny.

I have done that in V6

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help