Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 3 authors, 2021-09-02

Re: [PATCH 1/3] scsi: ufs: Probe for temperature notification support

From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Date: 2021-09-01 16:35:27
Also in: lkml

On 9/1/21 5:37 AM, Avri Altman wrote:
+static inline bool ufshcd_is_high_temp_notif_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
+{
+	return hba->dev_info.high_temp_notif;
+}
+
+static inline bool ufshcd_is_low_temp_notif_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
+{
+	return hba->dev_info.low_temp_notif;
+}
Please do not introduce single line inline functions.
+static inline bool ufshcd_is_temp_notif_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
+{
+	return ufshcd_is_high_temp_notif_allowed(hba) ||
+	       ufshcd_is_high_temp_notif_allowed(hba);
+}
Since this function is not in any hot path (command processing), 
shouldn't it be moved into ufshcd.c?

Thanks,

Bart.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help