Hi Bean,

quoted

+
+static inline void ufshpb_put_pre_req(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb,
+                                     struct ufshpb_req *pre_req)
+{
+       pre_req->req = NULL;
+       pre_req->bio = NULL;
+       list_add_tail(&pre_req->list_req, &hpb->lh_pre_req_free);
+       hpb->num_inflight_pre_req--;
+}
+
+static void ufshpb_pre_req_compl_fn(struct request *req,
blk_status_t error)
+{
+       struct ufshpb_req *pre_req = (struct ufshpb_req *)req-

quoted

end_io_data;

+       struct ufshpb_lu *hpb = pre_req->hpb;
+       unsigned long flags;
+       struct scsi_sense_hdr sshdr;
+
+       if (error) {
+               dev_err(&hpb->sdev_ufs_lu->sdev_dev, "block status
%d", error);
+               scsi_normalize_sense(pre_req->sense,
SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE,
+                                    &sshdr);
+               dev_err(&hpb->sdev_ufs_lu->sdev_dev,
+                       "code %x sense_key %x asc %x ascq %x",
+                       sshdr.response_code,
+                       sshdr.sense_key, sshdr.asc, sshdr.ascq);
+               dev_err(&hpb->sdev_ufs_lu->sdev_dev,
+                       "byte4 %x byte5 %x byte6 %x additional_len
%x",
+                       sshdr.byte4, sshdr.byte5,
+                       sshdr.byte6, sshdr.additional_length);
+       }

 
 
How can you print out sense_key and sense code here? sense code will
not be copied to pre_req->sense. you should directly use
scsi_request->sense or let pre_req->sense point to scsi_request->sense.

OK, I will fix it.

You update the new version patch so quickly. In another word, I am
wondering if you tested your patch before submitting?

I will check more carefully for the next patch.

Thanks,
Daejun