Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: target: core: check SR field in REPORT LUNS
From: Roman Bolshakov <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-26 17:20:47
Also in:
target-devel
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 11:42:51PM +0100, David Disseldorp wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 13:27:00 +0300, Dmitry Bogdanov wrote:quoted
Now REPORT LUNS for software device servers always reports all luns regardless of SELECT REPORT field. Add handling of that field according to SPC-4: * accept known values, * reject unknown values.We currently advertise SPC-3 VERSION compliance via standard INQUIRY data, so I think we should either support SPC-3 SELECT REPORT values or bump the VERSION field (SPC-4 behaviour is already scattered throughout LIO). Out of curiosity, do you know of any initiators which use this field?
Hi David, SELECT REPORT field can be used for vVOL (LU conglomerate) discovery and for well-known lun listing. The field is used by VMware ESXi: https://support.purestorage.com/Solutions/VMware_Platform_Guide/User_Guides_for_VMware_Solutions/Virtual_Volumes_User_Guide/vVols_User_Guide%3A_Protocol_Endpoints "PEs greatly extend the number of vVols that can be connected to an ESXi cluster; each PE can have up to 16,383 vVols per host bound to it simultaneously. Moreover, a new binding does not require a complete I/O rescan. Instead, ESXi issues a REPORT_LUNS SCSI command with SELECT REPORT to the PE to which the sub-lun is bound. The PE returns a list of sub-lun IDs for the vVols bound to that host. In large clusters, REPORT_LUNS is significantly faster than a full I/O rescan because it is more precisely targeted." The post also confirms that: https://sourceforge.net/p/scst/mailman/message/33030432/ A few more targets that support SELECT REPORT field below. Sun/Oracle tape library: https://docs.oracle.com/en/storage/tape-storage/storagetek-sl150-modular-tape-library/slorm/report-luns-a0h.html#GUID-4140F40D-BD9A-495C-9A86-8BD7E91C985C IBM Flash Storage: https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/sites/default/files/support/ssg/ssgdocs.nsf/0/95d7115d7eb428e485257f80005cc3a7/%24FILE/FlashSystem_840_SCSI_Interface_Manual_1.2.pdf With regards to bumping TCM to SPC-4, are there any objections if we submit a separate patch for that? Or resubmit a series with the patch? Thanks, Roman