Re: [PATCH scsi] Add NULL checking of return value from scsi_cmd_to_driver()
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Date: 2012-09-27 04:44:21
Also in:
lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2012-09-28 · Re: [PATCH scsi] Add NULL checking of return value from scsi_cmd_to_driver() · James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
- 2012-09-27 · Re: [PATCH scsi] Add NULL checking of return value from scsi_cmd_to_driver() · "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
- 2012-09-24 · Re: [PATCH scsi] Add NULL checking of return value from scsi_cmd_to_driver() · James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
- 2012-09-24 · Re: [PATCH scsi] Add NULL checking of return value from scsi_cmd_to_driver() · Li Zhong <hidden>
- 2012-09-24 · Re: [PATCH scsi] Add NULL checking of return value from scsi_cmd_to_driver() · James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 22:02 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
"James" == James Bottomley [off-list ref] writes:James> Plus, I think it fixes a bug where you get different behaviours James> from REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC commands when a driver is and isn't James> attached (I've cc'd Martin to see what he thinks). I'm fine with having the eh action be triggered for FS requests only, if that's what you're asking?
Sort of ... I was thinking do it for all non REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC commands (which includes flush and other strange types), but if you think it should only be for REQ_TYPE_FS, that's fine too. James