RE: [LSF/MM TOPIC] linux servers as a storage server - what'smissing?
From: Loke, Chetan <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-24 17:05:23
Also in:
linux-fsdevel
From: Loke, Chetan <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-24 17:05:23
Also in:
linux-fsdevel
quoted
But writes that have to fetch the non-cached data, will
unnecessarily
quoted
issue I/O to the fabric. These orphaned I/O's cause more pain in the cleanup. And if caching is enabled on the front-side then it's all the more painful. We can go one extra step and make FS fail read I/O for non-cached
data
quoted
too to avoid more orphan IOs.I don't really see this as a useful state. Read-only without a real backing file system or LUN is hit or miss, that file system should go offline :)
Last year when I checked, I forget but I think xfs(or ext4) was going read-only. If this is still the case then you are basically asking FS's to modify that behavior.