Thread (41 messages) 41 messages, 15 authors, 2012-01-26

RE: [LSF/MM TOPIC] linux servers as a storage server - what'smissing?

From: Loke, Chetan <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-24 17:05:23
Also in: linux-fsdevel

quoted
But writes that have to fetch the non-cached data, will
unnecessarily
quoted
issue I/O to the fabric. These orphaned I/O's cause more pain in the
cleanup.
And if caching is enabled on the front-side then it's all the more
painful.

We can go one extra step and make FS fail read I/O for non-cached
data
quoted
too to avoid more orphan IOs.
I don't really see this as a useful state. Read-only without a real
backing file
system or LUN is hit or miss, that file system should go offline :)
Last year when I checked, I forget but I think xfs(or ext4) was going
read-only.
If this is still the case then you are basically asking FS's to modify
that behavior.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help