Re: [Scst-devel] Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin <hidden>
Date: 2008-02-01 12:01:19
Also in:
lkml
Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008 5:25 PM, Joe Landman [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:quoted
Actually, I don't know what kind of conclusions it is possible to make from disktest's results (maybe only how throughput gets bigger or slower with increasing number of threads?), it's a good stress test tool, but not more.Unfortunately, I agree. Bonnie++, dd tests, and a few others seem to bear far closer to "real world" tests than disktest and iozone, the latter of which does more to test the speed of RAM cache and system call performance than actual IO.I have ran some tests with Bonnie++, but found out that on a fast network like IB the filesystem used for the test has a really big impact on the test results. If anyone has a suggestion for a better test than dd to compare the performance of SCSI storage protocols, please let it know.
I would suggest you to try something from real life, like: - Copying large file tree over a single or multiple IB links - Measure of some DB engine's TPC - etc.
Bart Van Assche. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Scst-devel mailing list Scst-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scst-devel