Christoph Hellwig wrote:

On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 01:19:36AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:

quoted

This is too ambitious this close to 2.6-pre,

No, it's not.  Eihet we do it properly or not at all.  Having to use
different headers for 2.4,2.6and 2.7/2.8 is just extremly stupid.

I'm going to send my patch to Marcelo too, since it doesn't break 
anything, and greatly reduces include annoyance for in-tree drivers 
outside drivers/scsi.

Also we have more intrusive stuff in scsi pending, 2.6.pre or not.

We'll see what akpm says...

	Jeff