Re: Possible bug handling bad I/Os?
From: Luben Tuikov <hidden>
Date: 2002-08-29 19:16:45
From: Luben Tuikov <hidden>
Date: 2002-08-29 19:16:45
Doug Ledford wrote:
Yep. It's the queue starvation issue that someone else brought up (can't remember who that was...). Basically, if you don't have some outstanding command that will complete after you fail your queue_command() call then there is no method of goosing the current holding queue in the mid layer. It doesn't have a timer backup goose method as of yet.
How hard would that be to add? Wouldn't it be an implied implementation as per SAM-3 status codes? (One can do magic using the new list implementation and macros... :-) -- Luben