Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 4 authors, 2002-07-29

Re: 2 PATCHES: fix request_tranferlength

From: Kurt Garloff <hidden>
Date: 2002-07-29 16:50:49

On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 09:00:21AM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
On 29 Jul 2002, Alan Cox wrote:

| On Sat, 2002-07-27 at 23:07, Matthew Dharm wrote:
| > >  	scsi_wait_req(SRpnt, (void *) cmd, (void *) buffer,
| > > -		      512, SD_TIMEOUT, MAX_RETRIES);
| > > +		      255, SD_TIMEOUT, MAX_RETRIES);
|
| Adjust it and the buffer size to be even and I'll test run it in -ac

One of the earlier emails quoted a 252 max. size from a newer spec.
252 is also what I used in my sd-many patches
http://www.suse.de/~garloff/scsi-many/

It does not incur a IGNORE_WIDE_RESIDUAL even on wide32 buses. Probably
that's why this size was specified for some transfers.

Regards,
-- 
Kurt Garloff                   [off-list ref]         [Eindhoven, NL]
Physics: Plasma simulations    [off-list ref]     [TU Eindhoven, NL]
Linux: SCSI, Security          [off-list ref]    [SuSE Nuernberg, DE]
 (See mail header or public key servers for PGP2 and GPG public keys.)

Attachments

  • (unnamed) [application/pgp-signature] 189 bytes
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help