Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: s390: gaccess: Cleanup access to guest frames
From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-18 09:00:20
Also in:
kvm, lkml
On 8/18/21 9:54 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 16.08.21 17:07, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:quoted
Introduce a helper function for guest frame access. Rewrite the calculation of the gpa and the length of the segment to be more readable. Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <redacted> --- arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c index b9f85b2dc053..df83de0843de 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c@@ -827,11 +827,26 @@ static int guest_page_range(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ga, u8 ar,return 0; } +static int access_guest_frame(struct kvm *kvm, enum gacc_mode mode, gpa_t gpa, + void *data, unsigned int len)I know, "frame" is a beautiful term for "page" -- can we just avoid using it because we're not using it anywhere else here? :) What's wrong with "access_guest_page()" ?
Ok, I'll use page for consistency's sake.
quoted
+{ + gfn_t gfn = gpa_to_gfn(gpa); + unsigned int offset = offset_in_page(gpa); + int rc;You could turn both const. You might want to consider reverse-christmas-treeing this.
Ok
quoted
+ + if (mode == GACC_STORE) + rc = kvm_write_guest_page(kvm, gfn, data, offset, len); + else + rc = kvm_read_guest_page(kvm, gfn, data, offset, len);Personally, I prefer passing in pfn + offset instead of a gpa. Also avoids having to convert back and forth.
In access_guest_real we get back the gpa directly from the translation function. After the next patch the same is true for access_guest. So using gpas everywhere is nicer. And if we were to introduce a len_in_page function the offset would not even show up as an intermediary.
quoted
+ return rc; +} + int access_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ga, u8 ar, void *data, unsigned long len, enum gacc_mode mode) { psw_t *psw = &vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw; - unsigned long _len, nr_pages, gpa, idx; + unsigned long nr_pages, gpa, idx; + unsigned int seg;Dito, reverse christmas tree might be worth keeping.quoted
unsigned long pages_array[2]; unsigned long *pages; int need_ipte_lock;@@ -855,15 +870,12 @@ int access_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ga, u8 ar, void *data,ipte_lock(vcpu); rc = guest_page_range(vcpu, ga, ar, pages, nr_pages, asce, mode); for (idx = 0; idx < nr_pages && !rc; idx++) { - gpa = *(pages + idx) + (ga & ~PAGE_MASK); - _len = min(PAGE_SIZE - (gpa & ~PAGE_MASK), len); - if (mode == GACC_STORE) - rc = kvm_write_guest(vcpu->kvm, gpa, data, _len); - else - rc = kvm_read_guest(vcpu->kvm, gpa, data, _len); - len -= _len; - ga += _len; - data += _len; + gpa = pages[idx] + offset_in_page(ga); + seg = min(PAGE_SIZE - offset_in_page(gpa), len); + rc = access_guest_frame(vcpu->kvm, mode, gpa, data, seg); + len -= seg; + ga += seg; + data += seg; } if (need_ipte_lock) ipte_unlock(vcpu);@@ -875,19 +887,17 @@ int access_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ga, u8 ar, void *data,int access_guest_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra, void *data, unsigned long len, enum gacc_mode mode) { - unsigned long _len, gpa; + unsigned long gpa; + unsigned int seg; int rc = 0; while (len && !rc) { gpa = kvm_s390_real_to_abs(vcpu, gra); - _len = min(PAGE_SIZE - (gpa & ~PAGE_MASK), len); - if (mode) - rc = write_guest_abs(vcpu, gpa, data, _len); - else - rc = read_guest_abs(vcpu, gpa, data, _len); - len -= _len; - gra += _len; - data += _len; + seg = min(PAGE_SIZE - offset_in_page(gpa), len);What does "seg" mean? I certainly know when "len" means -- which is also what the function eats.quoted
+ rc = access_guest_frame(vcpu->kvm, mode, gpa, data, seg); + len -= seg; + gra += seg; + data += seg; } return rc; }