Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] KVM: s390: pv: avoid stall notifications for some UVCs
From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2021-07-29 13:29:56
Also in:
kvm, lkml
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:49:03 +0200 Cornelia Huck [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28 2021, Claudio Imbrenda [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Improve make_secure_pte to avoid stalls when the system is heavily overcommitted. This was especially problematic in kvm_s390_pv_unpack, because of the loop over all pages that needed unpacking. Also fix kvm_s390_pv_init_vm to avoid stalls when the system is heavily overcommitted. Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> --- arch/s390/kernel/uv.c | 11 ++++++++--- arch/s390/kvm/pv.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c b/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c index aeb0a15bcbb7..fd0faa51c1bb 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c@@ -196,11 +196,16 @@ static int make_secure_pte(pte_t *ptep,unsigned long addr, if (!page_ref_freeze(page, expected)) return -EBUSY; set_bit(PG_arch_1, &page->flags); - rc = uv_call(0, (u64)uvcb); + rc = __uv_call(0, (u64)uvcb); page_ref_unfreeze(page, expected); - /* Return -ENXIO if the page was not mapped, -EINVAL otherwise */ - if (rc) + /* + * Return -ENXIO if the page was not mapped, -EINVAL for other errors. + * If busy or partially completed, return -EAGAIN. + */ + if (rc == 1) rc = uvcb->rc == 0x10a ? -ENXIO : -EINVAL; + else if (rc > 1) + rc = -EAGAIN; return rc; }Possibly dumb question: when does the call return > 1?
this is exactly what Janosch meant :) the next version will have #defines for the 4 possible CC values. in short: 0 OK 1 error 2 busy (nothing done, try again) 3 partial (something done but not all, try again)
gmap_make_secure() will do a wait_on_page_writeback() for -EAGAIN, is that always the right thing to do?
it's the easiest way to get to a place where we will be able to reschedule if needed. wait_on_page_writeback will probably do nothing in that case because the page is not in writeback. (a few minutes later) actually I have checked, it seems that the -EAGAIN gets eventually propagated to places where it's not checked properly! this will need some more fixing