Re: [RFC PATCH v2 06/18] x86: dump_trace() error handling
From: Josh Poimboeuf <hidden>
Date: 2016-04-29 14:00:45
Also in:
linuxppc-dev, lkml
From: Josh Poimboeuf <hidden>
Date: 2016-04-29 14:00:45
Also in:
linuxppc-dev, lkml
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 09:45:58PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
On 04/28/16 at 03:44P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:quoted
In preparation for being able to determine whether a given stack trace is reliable, allow the stacktrace_ops functions to propagate errors to dump_trace().Hi, Josh. Have you considered to make walk_stack function as non-return function, since there is no obvious error during detecting the frame points?
If you look at the next patch 07/18, there are several cases where walk_stack (print_context_stack_reliable) returns an error. For example, if a function gets preempted before it gets a chance to save the frame pointer, the function's caller would get skipped on the stack trace. So for preempted tasks, we always have to consider their stacks unreliable. -- Josh