On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 05:22:55PM +0100, David Heidelberg wrote:

On Mon, Dec 13 2021 at 17:23:49 -0600, Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 20:29:45 +0100, David Heidelberg wrote:

quoted

 Extend registers up to 2, also document their names.

 Also fixes warnings generated by `make
qcom/sdm845-oneplus-fajita.dtb`:
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-fajita.dt.yaml: rtc@6000:
reg: [[24576], [24832]] is too long
         From schema:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/qcom-pm8xxx-rtc.yaml
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-fajita.dt.yaml: rtc@6000:
'reg-names' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
         From schema:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/qcom-pm8xxx-rtc.yaml

 Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg [off-list ref]
 ---
  .../devicetree/bindings/rtc/qcom-pm8xxx-rtc.yaml         | 9
++++++++-
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
incorrect. These may not be new warnings.

Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check.
This will change in the future.

Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1567467


rtc@11d: compatible: Additional items are not allowed ('qcom,pm8921-rtc'
was unexpected)
	arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-mdm9615-wp8548-mangoh-green.dt.yaml

rtc@11d: compatible: ['qcom,pm8018-rtc', 'qcom,pm8921-rtc'] is too long
	arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-mdm9615-wp8548-mangoh-green.dt.yaml

Would you consider safe, if I sent patch to remove redundant
`qcom,pm8921-rtc` from arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-mdm9615.dtsi?

I don't know. Depends if anything uses that and doesn't know about 
'qcom,pm8018-rtc'.

Rob