Re: [PATCH 6/8] mfd: max77714: Add driver for Maxim MAX77714 PMIC
From: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net>
Date: 2021-10-13 21:39:39
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-watchdog, lkml
From: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net>
Date: 2021-10-13 21:39:39
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-watchdog, lkml
Hi, On 12/10/21 10:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 11/10/2021 17:56, Luca Ceresoli wrote:quoted
Add a simple driver for the Maxim MAX77714 PMIC, supporting RTC and watchdog only. Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net> --- MAINTAINERS | 2 + drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 14 ++++ drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 + drivers/mfd/max77714.c | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/mfd/max77714.h | 68 ++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 236 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/max77714.c create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/max77714.h(...)quoted
+ +static const struct of_device_id max77714_dt_match[] = { + { .compatible = "maxim,max77714" }, + {}, +};When converting to module - don't forget the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLEquoted
+ +static struct i2c_driver max77714_driver = { + .driver = { + .name = "max77714", + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(max77714_dt_match),Kbuild robot pointed it out - of_matc_ptr should not be needed, even for compile testing without OF.
I wonder whether it's better to add '#ifdef CONFIG_OF / #endif' around the struct of_device_id declaration. I think it's what most drivers do, even though I tend to prefer not adding #ifdefs making code less clean only for COMPILE_TESTING. -- Luca