On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 8:33 PM Hans de Goede [off-list ref] wrote:

On 1/26/21 6:14 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 6:55 PM Patrik Jakobsson
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 4:51 PM Andy Shevchenko
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 5:25 PM Patrik Jakobsson
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 1:37 PM Andy Shevchenko
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Hi guys,

This is first part of Intel MID outdated platforms removal. It's collected into
immutable branch with a given tag, please pull to yours subsystems.

Hi Andy,
Do you plan on eventually removing X86_INTEL_MID completely? If so,
then I should probably start looking at removing the corresponding
parts in GMA500.

Nope. It is related to only Medfield / Clovertrail platforms.

There are other (MID) platforms that may / might utilize this driver
in the future.

Right, there's still Oaktrail / Moorestown with hardware in the wild.

Actually Moorestown had to be removed a few years ago (kernel won't
boot on them anyway from that date when Alan removed support under
arch/x86 for it).

I'm talking about Merrifield and Moorefield that can utilize it and
also some other platforms that are not SFI based (Cedar something...
IIRC).

Yes at least there are some 64 bit capable SoCs with GMA500 which were
used in NAS like devices. These NAS-es actually have a VGA output
(and maybe also DVI?) which is attached to the GMA500.

Since you are talking about 64-bit, definitely they are *not*
Moorestown, Medfield, Clovertrail since the mentioned never were
64-bit. But it would be nice to see the CPU model number to be sure.

I know people are running Fedora on these, so we should at least keep
these supported.

Is it possible to gather the CPU model number from them? (Or at least
the exact device/box name)

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko