On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 09:26:20 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Gleixner [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
As suggested by Steven, change the type of RTC value to save trace buffer.
The original code did everything just like the above but stored every
value into ints, I just said that the value could be stored in chars to
save space.
A single u64 does not take more storage space than this and it's a single
store.
So to use rtc_tm_to_time64()? Is the work to do the calculations of the
conversion faster than a bunch of stores that are going to be in hot
cache?
-- Steve
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.