Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 3 authors, 2016-03-14

[rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH] rtc: s3c: Don't print an error on probe deferral

From: Javier Martinez Canillas <hidden>
Date: 2016-03-14 20:23:49
Also in: linux-samsung-soc, lkml

Hello Joe,

On 03/14/2016 05:03 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 16:59 -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
quoted
I don't think they make little sense now since even a non-native english
speaker like me can understand it :)
That's a non sequitur if ever I read one.
I was trying to be funny but it seems that I failed.
 
quoted
But yes, it's cryptic at the very least. That's the problem with long text
and the 80 char limit to make checkpatch.pl happy. I guess I can just move
the message a little bit even if that will make to not be properly aligned.
There's no issue with longer than 80 column lines
for these messages.  checkpatch wouldn't complain.
Great, I didn't know that checkpatch had an exception for the 80 column
rule. I'll post a v2 then.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help