Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 3 authors, 2016-02-24

[rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH] rtc: mt6397: Add platform device ID table

From: Javier Martinez Canillas <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-24 17:02:24
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek, lkml

Hello Arnd,

On 02/24/2016 01:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 16 February 2016 21:19:07 Eddie Huang wrote:
quoted
On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 12:37 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
quoted
On Monday 15 February 2016 11:50:48 Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
quoted
On 02/14/2016 10:58 PM, Eddie Huang wrote:

[snip]
quoted
quoted
@@ -412,6 +418,7 @@ static struct platform_driver mtk_rtc_driver = {
      },
      .probe  = mtk_rtc_probe,
      .remove = mtk_rtc_remove,
+    .id_table = mt6397_rtc_id,
   };

   module_platform_driver(mtk_rtc_driver);
@@ -419,4 +426,3 @@ module_platform_driver(mtk_rtc_driver);
   MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
   MODULE_AUTHOR("Tianping Fang <tianping.fang@mediatek.com>");
   MODULE_DESCRIPTION("RTC Driver for MediaTek MT6397 PMIC");
-MODULE_ALIAS("platform:mt6397-rtc");
This patch looks good to me, but I am wondering, since we tend to use
device tree method to match driver, do we still need support platform
device ID ?
I'm not familiar with neither this IP block nor the SoC so it is up to
you. I just noticed this issue when reviewing a regulator driver for a
similar PMIC posted by someone from mediatek.

I thought platform device was needed since the driver has a MODULE_ALIAS()
but please let me know what you prefer and I can re-spin the patch and
just remove the MODULE_ALIAS() if that makes more sense for this platform.
I agree. We can alway add a MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() if we get multiple
users of this driver on architectures that don't use devicetree yet.
Sure. Thanks the patch to add expandability to this driver.

Acked-by: Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@mediatek.com>
I think we misunderstood one another. I think we can drop both the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE and the MODULE_ALIAS: there is no need for another
driver ID when it is always probed using DT.
That's how I understood but then Eddie said the opposite so I got confused
and was waiting for your clarification. I'll re-spin and remove the alias.
	Arnd
Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help